Document Pages

82 Pages
Page 12
Eastern Area Cruise No. 2 and Eastern Grid Survey No. 1 -January 1967 This report is a summary of observations and collections made by POBSP personnel in the eastern Pacific Ocean from January 18 through January 28, 1967. (See map #1.) Participating Smithsonian personnel included Brian Harrington (Biologist-in-Charge), Robert DeLong, and David Burckhalter. Superior cooperation was received from the officers and crew of the U.S.N.S. SHEARWATER (T-AG 177), and epecially from Captain Gibson, Mr. Webber, and Mr. Wyatt. The grid cruise track is considered to have been as closely followed as conditions permitted, and all positions are considered accurate within five miles. Hourly LORAN fixes demonstrated that an accurate cruise tack was followed. As no equipment for taking bathothermographs was available, this phase of the survey was not possible. This report is divided into two sections: the first deals with the Eastern Grid, and the second summarizes the non-grid observations. Eastern Grid Survey No. 1 The Eastern Grid Survey was conducted from 0100 January 19 until 0748 January 27; 72.9 hours of diurnal observations were conducted over 690 linear miles. Diurnal observations are summarized in Table #1. In addition 34.6 hours of nocturnal observations were conducted. Nocturnal observations are of little significance and should be regarded lightly as weather and moonlight conditions seemed to cause great variations in bird activity around the ship. These observations are briefly summarized in Table 3, and occasional reference is also made in the species accounts. Weather during this cruise was variable throughout the survey. A relatively stationary high pressure system in the southern part of the grid greatly influenced weather during the last four days, while a passing low center during the first three days also brought weather changes. What influence these pressure centers have on pelagic birds is not known at present; thusly remarks on distribution of birds in the species accounts were made without consideration of weather centers. In reference to flocking, groups of five or more birds seen in one sighting (fiting the POBSP definition of a flock) were noted. But flocking in the sense of birds travelling and/or feeding together did not seem to occur along the grid at this time of the year. The closest simulation to flocking occurred on the 21st of January when a large number of fulmars were observed feeding in a small area. Other sightings of five or more birds together were almost entirely of resting birds, particularly gulls, storm petrels, and albatross, or of the birds following the ship. The latter group, of course, are not in association with each other, but with the ship. Thus at this season flocking activity appears insignificant, and hence is not included in the tables. For purposes of discussion, the grid has been divided into three sections. As will be seen in Table 2, significant differences in
Page 13
-2- bird populations and numbers occur from area to area; however, with the single exception of the concentration of fulmars mentioned previously, distribution of birds was fairly even within grid. Eastern Grid Species Accounts Black-footed Albatross 66 + 3 nocturnal (Diomedea nigripes) This Hawaiian Island breeder was present in all three sections of the grid, although the density was significantly lower in the northern tthird than in the southern two-thirds. Two banded birds (Nos. 757-26257 and 767-42423) were collected on January 21, and two more with bands were seen the following day. Gonad size and conditions on those collected indicated that both birds were sub-adults, which would be expected as breeders are presently nesting. The Black-foot almost always follows ships for undetermined lengths of time. An effort was made to learn how long they follow; evidence suggests that the period is variable. Some birds apparently follow only a few minutes, while others may follow all day and possibly through the night. During nocturnal watches it was established that Black-feet were following the ship, but no individuals could be identified. Laysan Albatross 12 (Diomedea immutabilis) Like the Black-foot, this species breeds in the Hawaiian Islands. Those birds present in the eastern Pacific are probably also sub-adults, although none were collected to verify this. The Laysan was not prone to following ships. However, some individuals followed for several hours, meandering considerable distances from the ship and then returning. Density within the grid was highest in the northern two-thirds; while individuals were rarely seen in the southern portion. Fulmar 139 (Fulmaris glacialis) This was the most abundant procellariform in the grid. Dark- phase birds out numbered other phases (light and intermediate) by 5:1, suggesting that these birds are from the more southern of the north Pacific populations, i.e. the Aleutians as opposed to the Bering Sea populations. Highest density occurred in the northern portions of the grid and dropped to only one sighting in the southern portion. Figures in Table 2 are somewhat misleading as most of those recorded for both the northern and central portions were in an apparently favored feeding area on the eastern end of the legs connected by points D and E (see map 2). Throughout the remainder of the grid, sightings were relatively sparse. Occasionally a fulmar was noted to follow the ship for five or ten minutes. One dark-phase bird was collected.
Page 14
Pale-footed Shearwater (Puffinus carneipes) One bird was well-observed on January 20 in the northern area of the grid. Sooty Shearwater (Puffinus griseus) Slender-billed Shearwater (Puffinus tenvirostris) Sooty/Slender-billed (unidentified) 3 Two sooties and one slender-billed were identified in the central third of the grid. In addition three unidentified sooty/slender-billed shearwaters were recorded in the northern section. White-winged Petrel (Pterodroma leucoptera) Pterodroma sp.? (either P. cookii or P. leucoptera) To date members of this genus were only suspected to occur off the west coast of North America, and to date there have been no known collections. However one bird well-observed during this survey was quite definitely P. leucoptera. This bird, seen at close range, was a dark-phase type with a white neck and throat. It was, however, unlike the dark-phase birds seen in the central Pacific in that the underwing had a white central area bordered with black. Seven additional small Pterodroma were noted but not identified to species. It is believed, however, that none of those seen well (5) were P. hypoleuca. Some had very light underwings suggesting P. cookii or P. leucoptera masafuerae, but no positive identification could be made. Herald Petrel (Pterodroma heraldica) One dark-phase bird of this species was identified after being well-observed for five minutes. It should be considered accidental to the northeastern Pacific. Fork-tailed Petrel (Oceanodroma furcata) All sightings were of birds in the northern and central portions of the grid. Sub-specific identifications will have to await representative collections.
Page 15
Leach's Petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) Although identified only as white-rumped storm petrels, probably all the black storm petrels with white rumps were Leach's type. In addition many of the 25 birds identified only as storm petrel species were also probably Leach's. The density of the Leach's petrels increased from north to south, and probably included more than one sub-species. More collecting is needed to determine this. Two specimens were collected. Black Storm Petrel (Loomelania melania) One bird in the central portion of the grid was identified as probably being this species. Red Phalarope (Phalaropus fulicarius) This species was noted most frequently in the southern two- thirds of the grid. In addition, three birds identified only as phalarope sp. were likely of this type. Most of the sightings were of birds sitting in the water, usually near logs or sargassum. All were in winter plumage. Two specimens were collected. Pomarine Jaeger (Stercorarius pomarinus) Parasitic Jaeger (Stercorarius parasiticus) Jaeger species All sightings were of single birds in the northern two-thirds of the grid. Unlike the jaegers near Oahu, these birds did not seem to be attracted to ships. A few were noted to be chasing kittiwakes, but no other "prey" was noted. Distribution was confined to the northern two-thirds of the grid. Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus) One immature bird was seen in the central portion of the grid. Glaucous-winged Gull (Larus glaucescens) Distribution and density was fairly even throughout the grid survey. All sightings were of birds following the ship, and all were immature or sub-adult birds. Two specimens were collected.
Page 16
Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) Undoubtedly the most common large gull found in the grid at this season was the Herring Gull. Despite periodic checks of the gulls following the ship, no species other than herring and glaucous-winged gulls were found doing so. This is in contrast to specific composition of gull populations in equivalent latitudes along the coast (where the california gull predominates). All the large gulls seen in the grid followed the ship for hours, and one distinctively marked bird was noted to be present for at least eight hours. The age composition of those following the ship averaged approximately 50 per cent adults and the rest were immatures and sub-adults. This would suggest that younger birds have a greater pelagic wandering tendency as the age ratio in a normal population would be predominately adult birds. Two specimens were collected. Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) This was the most abundant species throughout the grid during this survey. Density declined from north to south. Age composition was predominately immature birds (67 percent immatures in the northern third, 100 per cent immatures in the southern third). Apparently the grid includes a pelagic border of the range for this species. This is suggested both by the density distribution (see Table 2) and the age distribution. Two specimens were collected. Xanthus Murrelet (Endomychura hypoleuca) Two birds were sighted during the survey. Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhina monocerata) All sightings of this species were in the northern two-thirds of the grid; most were of swimming birds. It should be noted that the density figures for the alcid are not comparable to the other species for two reasons. First, they spend most of their time on the water where observations are difficult. Secondly, because alcids spend considerable time diving, they often go unseen. Thus density figures should be used as an index only within the alcid group. Three specimens were collected. Grid Summary As may be seen from Table 2 and the species accounts, the grid seems to include the pelagic range border for several bird species. Whether this is due to ocean currents, isotherms, or is in fact a
Page 19
Table 2: Sectional Breakdown of Eastern Pacific Grid Bird Populations, January 1967 Species Northern Third Central Third Southern Third No. Birds % of Total Birds in North Section Birds per Square mile No. % BPS0 Mi. No. % B/sg. mi. B.-F. Albatross ** #7 10.6 1.8 .010 38 57.5 9.6 .033 29 44.0 16.8 .032 Laysan Albatross ** 4 33.3 1.0 .006 11 91.7 2.8 .005 2 16.7 1.2 .002 Pale-footed Shearwater * 1 100.0 .3 .003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sooty Shearwater * 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 .5 .004 0 0 0 0 Slender-billed Shearwater * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .002 0 0 0 0 Fulmar * 64 46.0 16.2 .173 74 53.3 18.8 .128 1 .7 .6 .002 Harold's Petrel * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Leach's Petrel ** 6 4.8 1.5 .032 50 39.7 12.7 .173 70 55.5 40.5 .308 Fork-tailed Petrel * 5 38.8 1.2 .027 8 61.6 2.0 .028 0 0 0 0 White-winged Petrel * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Red Phalarope * 2 10.5 .5 .022 11 52.5 2.8 .076 8 38.0 4.6 .070 Glaucous Gull * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Glaucous-winged Gull * 5 35.7 1.2 .014 7 50.0 1.8 .012 4 28.6 2.3 .009 Herring Gull * 45 35.2 11.2 .122 76 59.5 19.3 .132 32 25.0 18.5 .071 Black-legged Kittiwake * 211 70.5 52.5 .581 69 23.0 17.5 .120 20 15.5 11.6 .057 Bmarine Jaeger * 3 50.7 .7 .008 3 50.0 .7 .007 0 0 0 0 Parasitic Jaeger * 3 75.0 .7 .008 1 25.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Xantus Murrelet * 1 50.0 # .012 1 50.0 # .006 0 0 0 0 Rhinoceros Auklet * 11 64.8 # .118 6 35.3 # .042 0 0 0 0 Shearwater/Petrels * 1 10.0 .3 .003 6 60.0 1.5 .011 3 30.0 1.7 .007 Sooty/slender-bills * 3 100.0 .7 .008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storm Petrel Species 3 12.0 .7 .016 20 80.0 5.1 .069 2 8.0 1.2 .009 Gull Species * 10 100% 25 .027 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jaeger Species * 3 60.0 .7 .008 2 48.0 .5 .004 0 0 0 0 Alcid Species * 11 92.0 # .118 0 0 0 0 1 8.0 # .008 Pterodroma Species * 0 0 0 0 6 85.7 1.5 .011 1 14.3 .6 .002 Bird Species * 1 100.0 .3 .003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phalarope Species * 2 66.6 .5 .022 1 33.3 .3 .006 0 0 0 0 # See Species account # Zone totals more than for whole grid cruise due to allowance for birds following the ship. + assumed to be visible for two miles. X Assumed visible at 1 mile $ Assumed " " 1/2 " $ " " 1/4 "
Page 20
Delphinidae (Porpoise or/and Dolphin) Six animals that were not identified to species were recorded in the grid area. Delphinus delphis bairdi (Common or Baird Dolphin) Ninety-four Baird Dolphins were recorded. Fifty of these were in one group seen on 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. The remaining 44 animals were seen in the southern third of the grid area. All of the animals were attracted to the ship and on occasions a few rode the bow wake for a short period of time, affording excellent opportunity for good identification. Phocoenoides dalli (Dall Porpoise) Three Dall Porpoise were recorded in the Santa Barbara Channel. Whale sp. Three whales were seen, one on 18 January and the others in the southern third of the grid, that were not specifically identified due to short durations of observation. Orcinus orca (Killer Whale) Four Killer Whales were seen on 25 January in the southern third of the grid. No disparity was noted in the size of dorsal fins, indicating there was no adult male travelling with the pod. Balaenoptera physalus (Fin Whale) Three animals were identified as possibly being of this species on 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. The observer does not wish this sighting regarded as a positive identification. DISCUSSION: The California Coastal marine mammals are many and varied. However, in the grid area which traverses water over 1000 fathoms or more there are fewer forms and population densities are lower. Numbers of seasonally resident mammals do appear large enough to be considered important in the survey. It is interesting that we noted no California Gray Whales (Eschrichtius gibbosus) in the grid area during this survey. These animals are abundant along the coast at this time of year. They apparently do not wander far to sea during migration and breeding season.
Page 25
Part 2 of Preliminary Report Eastern Pacific Survey No. 2, Non-grid Portion; 18 and 27 Jan., 1957 The non-grid portion of this report deals with only two days of observation. On 18 January observations were made between Port Hueneme and Point Conception (see map 1), and on 27 January between the end of the eastern grid and Long Beach, California. Non-grid observations are summarized in table six; the two days are treated separately to preserve the impressive differences between coastal and pelagic bird populations. Mammals seen in non-grid areas are covered in the grid section of this report. Eastern Pacific Species accounts----Non-grid, January 1967. Albatross, Shearwaters, and Petrels No albatross were noted in the coastal waters; however, it is probable that stragglers wander inshore on occasion. Shearwater/Petrels were represented only by Fulmars in the coastal area. This species was also present in the Grid, but was most concentrated in areas within 75 miles of land. No Storm Petrels were noted in the coastal waters, but undoubtedly occur. Pelicans and Cormorants Pelicans and Cormorants are frequently noted in coastal waters; none were seen far at sea. However, it is quite probable that some cormorants occur well offshore, especially during migration. Gulls Glacous-winged Gulls were present both at sea and along the coast, but unlike the pelagic group, the coastal population is composed of both adults and immatures. Western Gulls were found only along the coast. The density figures
Page 28
MARINE MAMMALS - by Robert DeLong One hundred fifty-five marine mammals of four families and eight species were recorded. Fifty-five percent of the mammals were seen on 18 January while in Santa Barbara Channel and beyond to Point Arguello. The distribution of the mammals seen in this area would be considered coastal or neritic. All mammals observed in pelagic environment were within the grid area. Pelagic observations accounted for 45% of the total mammals seen. SPECIES ACCOUNT: Otariidae (Eared Seals) Twenty animals were recorded only as belonging to this family, as specific identifications were not obtained. These animals were probably California Sea Lions, Stellar Sea Lions, or Northern Fur Seal. It is possible that the Guadalupe Fur Seal occurs in the grid area, but populations are all small and their distribution is not well known. Eleven Otariidae were recorded on 18 January, and nine were recorded in the grid area. Eumatopias jubata (Stellar Sea Lion) Two seen 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. Zalophus californianus (California Sea Lion) Seven seen 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. Callorhinus ursinus (Northern Fur Seal) Five animal were identified as definitely being fur seals on 19 and 20 January. These animals were seen only in waters over a thousand fathoms and all were on the northern leg of the grid. It is probable that other Otariidae seen in the grid were also of this species, but it is difficult to differentiate between females and young males of this species and the California Sea Lion at sea. Although fur seals are seldom recorded as vocalizing while at sea, one adult female was evoked to give two vocal responses by imitating the call of a fur seal pup. Phoca vitulina (Harbor Seal) One Harbor Seal was seen in the Santa Barbara Channel. Cetacea (Whales and Porpoises) Seven animals were assigned only to this order on 18 January.
Page 30
Eastern Grid Cruise No. 2 and Eastern Grid Survey No. 1 -January 1967 This report is a summary of observations and collections made by TURSP personnel in the eastern Pacific Ocean from January 18 through January 28, 1967. (See map #1.) Participating Smithsonian personnel included Brian Harrington (Biologist-in-Charge), Robert DeLong, and David Burckhalter. Superior cooperation was received from the officers and crew of the U.S.N.S. SHEARWATER (T-AG 177), particularly from Captain Gibson, Mr. Webber, and Mr. Wyatt. The grid cruise track is considered to have been as closely followed as conditions permitted, and all positions are considered accurate within five miles. Hourly LORAN fixes demonstrated that an accurate grid track was followed. As no equipment for taking bathythermographs was available, this phase of the survey was not possible. This report is divided into two sections: the first deals with the eastern grid, and the second summarizes the non-grid observations. Eastern Grid Survey No. 1 The Eastern Grid Survey was conducted from 0100 January 19 to 07h8 January 27; 72.9 hours of diurnal observations were conducted for 690 linear miles. Diurnal observations are summarized in Table 1. In addition 3h.6 hours of nocturnal observations were conducted. Nocturnal observations are of little significance and should be regarded lightly as weather and moonlight conditions seemed to cause great variations in bird activity around the ship. These observations are briefly summarized in Table 3, and occasional reference is also made in the species accounts. Weather during this cruise was variable throughout the survey. A relatively stationary high pressure system in the southern part of the grid greatly influenced weather during the last four days; a passing low center during the first three days also brought weather changes. What influence these pressure centers have on pelagic birds is not known at present; thusly remarks on distribution of birds in the species accounts were made without consideration of weather effects. In reference to flocking, groups of five or more birds seen in one sighting (fitting the PORSP definition of a flock) were noted. But flocking in the sense of birds travelling and/or feeding together did not seem to occur along the grid at this time of the year. The closest equivalent to flocking occurred on the 21st of January when a large number of fulmars were observed feeding in a small area. Other sightings of five or more birds together were almost entirely of following birds, particularly gulls, storm petrels, and albatross, or of birds following the ship. The latter group, of course, are not in association with each other, but with the ship. Thus at this stage, flocking activity appears insignificant, and hence is not included in the tables. For purposes of discussion, the grid has been divided into three sections. As will be seen in Table 2, significant differences in
Page 31
bird populations and numbers occur from area to area; however, the single exception of the concentration of fulmars mentioned previously, distribution of birds was fairly even within grid. Eastern Bird Species Accounts Black-footed Albatross (Diomedea nigripes) This Hawaiian Island breeder was present in all three sections of the grid, although the density was significantly lower in the northern third than in the southern two-thirds. Two banded birds (Nos. 797-26257 and 767-h2h23) were collected on January 21, and two more with bands were seen the following day. Based on size and conditions on those collected indicated that both birds were sub-adults, which would be expected as breeders are presently nesting. The black-foot almost always follows ships for undetermined lengths of time. An effort was made to learn how long they follow; evidence suggests that the period is variable. Some birds apparently follow only a few minutes, while others may follow all day and possibly through the night. During nocturnal watches it was established that black-feet were following the ship, but no individuals could be identified. Laysan Albatross (Diomedea immutabilis) Like the Black-foot, this species breeds in the Hawaiian Islands. Those birds present in the eastern Pacific are probably also sub-adults, although none were collected to verify this. The Laysan was not noted to following ships. However, some individuals followed for several hours, meandering considerable distances from the ship and then returning. Density within the grid was highest in the northern two-thirds; while individuals were rarely seen in the southern portion. Fulmar (Fulmaris glacialis) This was the most abundant procellariiform in the grid. Dark- phase birds outnumbered other phases (light and intermediate) by 5:1, suggesting that these birds are from the more southern of the North Pacific populations, i.e., the Aleutians as opposed to the Bering Sea populations. Highest density occurred in the northern portions of the grid and dropped to only one sighting in the southern portion. Figures in Table 2 are somewhat misleading as most of those recorded for both the northern and central portions were in an apparently favored feeding area on the eastern end of the legs connected by points D and E (see map 2). Throughout the remainder of the grid, sightings were relatively sparse. Occasionally a fulmar was noted to follow the ship for five or ten minutes. One dark-phase bird was collected.
Page 32
Pale-footed Shearwater (Puffinus carneipes) One bird was well-observed on January 20 in the northern area of the grid. Sooty Shearwater (Puffinus griseus) Slender-billed Shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris) Sooty/Slender-billed (unidentified) 3 Two sooties and one slender-billed were identified in the central third of the grid. In addition three unidentified sooty/slender-billed shearwaters were recorded in the northern section. White-winged Petrel (Pterodroma leucoptera) Pterodroma sp.? (either P. cookii or P. leucoptera) To date members of this genus were only suspected to occur off the west coast of North America, and to date there have been no known collections. However one bird well-observed during this survey was quite definitely P. leucoptera. This bird, seen at close range, was a dark-phase type with a white neck and throat. It was, however, unlike the dark-phase birds seen in the central Pacific in that the underwing had a white central area bordered with black. Seven additional small Pterodroma were noted but not identified to species. It is believed, however, that none of those seen well (5) were P. hypoleuca. Some had very light underwings suggesting P. cookii or P. leucoptera masafuerae, but no positive identification could be made. Herald Petrel (Pterodroma heraldica) One dark-phase bird of this species was identified after being well-observed for five minutes. It should be considered accidental to the northeastern Pacific. Fork-tailed Petrel (Oceanodroma furcata) All sightings were of birds in the northern and central portion of the grid. Sub-specific identifications will have to await representative collections.
Page 33
Leach's Petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) Although identified only as white-rumped storm petrels, or all the black storm petrels with white rump were Leach's type. addition many of the 25 birds identified only as storm petrel spp. were also probably Leach's. The density of the Leach's petrels increased from north to south, and probably included more than one sub-species. More collecting is needed to determine this. Two specimens were collected. Black Storm Petrel (Loomelania melania) One bird in the central portion of the grid was identified as probably being this species. Red Phalarope (Phalaropus fulicarius) This species was noted most frequently in the southern two- thirds of the grid. In addition, three birds identified only as phalarope sp. were likely of this type. Most of the sightings were of birds sitting in the water, usually near logs or sargassum. All were in winter plumage. Two specimens were collected. Pomarine Jaeger (Stercorarius pomarinus) Parasitic Jaeger (Stercorarius parasiticus) Jaeger species All sightings were of single birds in the northern two-thirds of the grid. Unlike the jaegers near Oahu, these birds did not seem to be attracted to ships. A few were noted to be chasing kittiwakes, but no other "prey" was noted. Distribution was confined to the northern two-thirds of the grid. Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus) One immature bird was seen in the central portion of the grid. Glaucous-winged Gull (Larus glaucescens) Distribution and density was fairly even throughout the grid. All sightings were of birds following the ship, and all were in or sub-adult birds. Two specimens were collected.
Page 34
Herring Gull (larus argentatus) Undoubtedly the most common large gull found in the grid season was the Herring Gull. Despite periodic checks of the following the ship, no species other than herring and glaucous-winged gulls were found doing so. This is in contrast to specific composition of gull populations in equivalent latitudes along the coast (where the california gull predominates). All the large gulls seen in the grid followed the ship for hours, and one distinctively marked bird was noted to be present for at least eight hours. The age composition of those following the ship averaged approximately 50 per cent adults, the rest were immatures and sub-adults. This would suggest that gull birds have a greater pelagic wandering tendency as the age ratio in a normal population would be predominately adult birds. Two specimens were collected. Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) This was the most abundant species throughout the grid during this survey. Density declined from north to south. Age composition predominately immature birds (67 percent immatures in the northern third, 100 per cent immatures in the southern third). Apparently, the grid includes a pelagic border of the range for this species. This is suggested both by the density distribution (see Table 2) and age distribution. Two specimens were collected. Xanthus Murrelet (Endomychura hypoleuca) Two birds were sighted during the survey. Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhinna mononerata) All sightings of this species were in the northern two-thirds of the grid; most were of swimming birds. It should be noted that the density figures for the alcids are not comparable to the other species for two reasons. First, they spend most of their time in the water where observations are difficult. Secondly, because they spend considerable time diving, they often go unseen. Thus density figures should be used as an index only within the alcid group. Three specimens were collected. Grid Summary As may be seen from Table 2 and the species accounts, the grid seems to include the pelagic range border for several bird species, whether this is due to ocean currents, isotherms, or is in fact a
Page 36
Table 2: Sectional Breakdown of Eastern Pacific Grid Bird Populations, January 1967 Species Northern Third Central Third Southern Third No. % of Total Birds in Marrion Section Birds per square mile No. % % BPS/mi No. % % B/9 mi B.-F. Albatross ** 7 10.6 1.8 .010 38 57.5 9.6 .033 1 1.0 16.8 .032 Laysan Albatross ** 4 33.3 1.0 .006 11 91.7 2.8 .005 2 16.7 1.2 .002 Pale-footed Shearwater * 1 100.0 .3 .003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sooty Shearwater * 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 .5 .004 0 0 0 0 Slender-billed Shearwater * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .002 0 0 0 0 Fulmar * 64 46.0 16.2 .173 74 53.3 18.8 .128 1 .7 .6 .002 Harold's Petrel * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Leach's Petrel ** 6 4.8 1.5 .032 50 39.7 12.7 .173 70 55.5 40.5 .308 Fork-tailed Petrel ** 5 38.8 1.2 .027 8 61.6 2.0 .028 0 0 0 0 White-winged Petrel * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Red Phalarope ** 2 10.5 .5 .022 11 52.5 2.8 .076 3 38.0 4.6 .070 Glacous Gull * 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Glacous-winged Gull * 5 35.7 1.2 .014 7 50.0 1.8 .012 4 28.6 2.3 .099 Herring Gull * 45 35.2 11.2 .122 76 59.5 19.3 .132 32 25.0 18.5 .071 Black-legged Kittiwake * 211 70.5 52.5 .581 69 23.0 17.5 .120 20 15.5 11.6 .057 Bmarine Jaeger * 3 50.7 .7 .008 3 50.0 .7 .007 0 0 0 0 Parasitic Jaeger * 3 75.0 .7 .008 1 25.0 .3 .001 0 0 0 0 Xantus Murrelet ** 1 50.0 #* .012 1 50.0 #* .006 0 0 0 0 Rhinoceros Auklet ** 11 64.8 ## .118 6 35.3 ## .042 0 0 0 0 Shearwater/Petrels * 1 10.0 .3 .003 6 60.0 1.5 .011 3 30.0 1.7 .007 Sooty/Slender-bills * 3 100.0 .7 .008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storm Petrel Species ** 3 12.0 .7 .016 20 80.0 5.1 .069 8 8.0 1.2 .009 Gull Species * 10 100% 2.5 .027 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jaeger Species * 3 60.0 .7 .008 2 48.0 .5 .004 0 0 0 0 Alcid Species ** 11 92.0 # .118 0 0 0 0 1 8.0 # .008 Pterodroma Species * 0 0 0 0 6 85.7 1.5 .011 1 14.3 .6 .002 Bird Species * 1 100.0 .3 .003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phalarope Species ** 2 66.6 .5 .022 1 33.3 .3 .006 0 0 0 0 # See Species account * Zone totals more than for whole grid cruise due to allowance for birds following the ship. + assumed to be visible for two miles X Assumed visible at 1 mile Q Assumed "" 1/2 "" Φ "" 1/4 ""
Page 41
Part 2 of Preliminary Report Eastern Pacific Survey No. 2, Non-grid Portion; 18 and 27 Jan., 1967 The non-grid portion of this report deals with only two days of observation. On 18 January observations were made between Port Hueneme and Point Conception (see map 1), and on 27 January between the end of the eastern grid and Long Beach, California. Non-grid observations are summarized in table six; the two days are treated separately to preserve the impressive differences between coastal and pelagic bird populations. Mammals seen in non-grid areas are covered in the grid section of this report. Eastern Pacific Species accounts----Non-grid, January 1967. Albatross, Shearwaters, and Petrels No albatross were noted in the coastal waters; however, it is probable that stragglers wander inshore on occasion. Shearwater/Petrels were represented only by Fulmars in the coastal area. This species was also present in the Grid, but was most concentrated in areas within 75 miles of land. No Storm Petrels were noted in the coastal waters, but undoubtedly occur. Pelicans and Cormorants Pelicans and Cormorants are frequently noted in coastal waters; none were seen far at sea. However, it is quite probable that some cormorants occur well offshore, especially during migration. Gulls Glacous-winged Gulls were present both at sea and along the coast, but unlike the pelagic group, the coastal population is composed of both adults and immatures. Western Gulls were found only along the coast. The density figures
Page 44
HARDING ANIMALS - by Robert Belong One hundred fifty-five marine mammals of four families and six species were recorded. Fifty-five percent of the mammals were seen on 18 January while in Santa Barbara Channel and beyond to Point Arguello. The distribution of the mammals seen in this area would be considered coastal or neritic. All mammals observed in pelagic environment were within the grid area. Pelagic observations accounted for 15% of the total mammals seen. SPECIES ACCOUNT: Otariidae (Eared Seals) Twenty animals were recorded only as belonging to this family, as specific identifications were not obtained. These animals were probably California Sea Lions, Stellar Sea Lions, or Northern Fur Seal. It is possible that the Guadalupe Fur Seal occurs in the grid area, but populations are all small and their distribution is not well known. Eleven Otariidae were recorded on 18 January, and nine were recorded in the grid area. Zalophus californianus (California Sea Lion) Seven seen 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. Callorhinus ursinus (Northern Fur Seal) Five animals were identified as definitely being fur seals on 19 and 20 January. These animals were seen only in waters over thousand fathoms and all were on the northern leg of the grid. It is probable that other Otariidae seen in the grid were also of this species, but it is difficult to differentiate between females and young males of this species and the California Sea Lion at sea. Although fur seals are seldom recorded as vocalizing while at sea, one adult female was evoked to give two vocal responses by imitating the call of a fur seal pup. Phoca vitulina (Harbor Seal) One Harbor Seal was seen in the Santa Barbara Channel. Cetacea (Whales and Porpoises) Seven animals were assigned only to this order on 18 January.
Page 45
Delphinidae (Porpoise or/and Del) six animals that were not identified to species were recorded in the grid area. Delphinus delphis Bairdi (Common or Baird Dolphin) Ninety-four Baird Dolphins were recorded. Fifty of these were in one group seen on 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. The remaining 44 animals were seen in the southern third of the grid area. All of the animals were attracted to the ship and on occasions rode the bow wake for a short period of time, affording excellent opportunity for good identification. Phocoenoides dalli (Dall Porpoise) Three Dall Porpoise were recorded in the Santa Barbara Channel. whale sp. Three whales were seen, one on 18 January and the others in the southern third of the grid, that were not specifically identified due to short durations of observation. Orcinus orca (Killer Whale) Four Killer Whales were seen on 25 January in the southern third of the grid. No disparity was noted in the size of dorsal fins, indicating there was no adult male travelling with the pod. Balaenoptera physalus (Fin Whale) Three animals were identified as possibly being of this species on 18 January in Santa Barbara Channel. The observer does not wish this sighting regarded as a positive identification. DISCUSSION: The California Coastal marine mammals are many and varied. However, in the grid area which traverses water over 1000 fathoms or more there are fewer forms and population densities are lower. Numbers of seasonally resident mammals do appear large enough to be considered important in the survey. It is interesting that we noted no California Gray Whales (Eschrichtius gibbosus) in the grid area during this survey. These animals are abundant along the coast at this time of year. They apparently do not wander far to sea during migration and breeding season.
Page 54
{ "text": "Ship\nDirection\n\nSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION\nDIVISION OF BIRDS\nAT SEA DAILY LOG - E\n\nSPECIMEN\nor\n\nTIME\nSPEClES\n#\nDIR. BAND NO. REMARKS\n\n1158\nPall 20\n5\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\n-\ [TRANSCRIPTION_TRUNCATED_DUE_TO_LOOP]
Page 70
{ "text": "Ship\nDirection\n\nE\n\nSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION\nDIVISION OF BIRDS\nAT SEA DAILY LOG - E\n\nOBSERVERS:\n\nDate 23 Jan '67\nPg.# 1\n\nTIME SPECIES # DIR. BAND NO. REMARKS\n\n0715\n0720\n0725\n0745\n0803\n0806\n0820\n0830\n0855\n0915\n0930\n0940\n1022\n1041\n1108\n1125\n1155\n1200\n\nWRSP\nBLK\nBLK\n\nGlacous-winged\nGull\n\nWRSP\n\nBLK\nBLK\n\nShen/pel\nFurktail/pet.\nWRSP\n\nPterodroma\nCooki:\n\nLaysan A\nPterodroma\nheraldica\n\n1201\n1229\n1229\n1236\n1232\n1310\n1320\n1348\n1349\n1358\n1410\n1450\n1505\n1505\n1545\n1558\n1607\n1615\n1635\n\nBLK\nWRSP\nHerring Gull\n7BFA\nBLK\nBLK\nStorm Pet.\nStorm Pet.\nWRSP\nWRSP\nII\nPleucoptera\nBLK\nBLK\nWRSP\nBLK\nWRSP\nBLK\nWRSP\n\n2\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n2\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n [TRANSCRIPTION_TRUNCATED_DUE_TO_LOOP]