(C). Fl. I do strongly suggest those) (B) (somewhat smaller ifts). But the very small flowers solitary v almost sessile (look less sessile). Very young pods pub. escent. Beaks curved toward edge opp. placenta. Pod (inside) now shows what may develop into division or constriction bet. the several seeds ???. L. subpinnatus Lag. J 552; M 258 3-23-39 Oxalis californica Knuth. M 276; See O. Wrightii Gray J 588" Fl v f2. Cut in road (not "lawn or cult. place") bet Rancho Santa Fe v Lake Hodges. 3-23-39 Sanicula Menziesii H & A. J 698; M 349 Fl. Near Peony on opp. side of road. 3-23-39? Lepidium virginicum L. J 439; M 190; G 425 Fl v f2. Thought to be L.v - seen col. Pzss. near Lupinus, Spec. only 4-6 in high v basal ls deeply pinnatifid (not the class.) & G's ill but R.B.T. remembers the odd, tiny plants at F.V. 1938" Cfd with L. lasiocarpum (col perhaps 3-20) v L. dictyotum] 3-25. Pedicella d h.d - really flat; L.h - perhaps somewhat less so. & L.v - not as def. keretic as desc. leads one to expect. Pods glabrous. Caule study seems to prove that L.v - has cotyledons at "cumibent" (G) v the other 2 cotyledons incumbent (Wore to this in J & M)