June 21, 1970 371 - [illegible] and J - [illegible] and H K - [illegible] for I - [illegible] and L and M E - [illegible] and G and J - [illegible] and T but X and Y F or I - [illegible] and Z Y - [illegible] and K and N and V 22 = 31 [illegible] In order that Y, L, H will not be confused with J (J + so = I) but W, IV, BC will 0:11:16 = 02:15; where J = [illegible] for (+10) X119; and V = [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] +J, together with W, so = [illegible] plus - Yc log A [illegible] but if J + 17 or 19 is not all of YH and p, W, T ring (previous words) where T has? As we = .3 : ill:J along + J + moreA + Jg +T (N. 2025) then J + M of [illegible] and J + [illegible] at 10T - 16:19H = 14 +T in subject here to b = .7 if L and m are all divided by 44 +T, T2 produced? so 37 - U +X = more? at 14 +T, (a:21m) such [illegible], so it is if L and m are not [illegible] and A AT change +2 F+5I + shift H or J + we +J + to b = a = and b and D 610 at 7p I if T +T, during +T would be known? If it is made of 4 p 10 [illegible] in the middle A - [illegible]