Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
th 1° run a small pad-like area.
Thickness of lowest 2's also
immediately great for being so
close to margin. 3's piece
but cannot see how even to
del if 4° or not it is not.
Have seen similar too, in F.v.
V 11338 Glanera ungeri Ell. Hen II (1871) p. 472, Pl. 44(C)
At frag of lf so poor etc. 2's very thin opp.
crop, margin not preserved, 2' badly preserved
much thinner than 2's, opp piece. Marginal
teeth an artifact of preservation. Part of diff from
Quercus Complex (due to great diff in size between
2°s & 3°s) but really undet without much more
material. Pros. Alnusorus zillora rather than
Glanera would be a better det.
v 52 51.8 Populus zadkashi Hen II (1871) p. 468, Pl. 43(15)
apparently a Cerciphyllum arctean. lf teeth
of proper shape. Other variation is good.
Also Pterospmites spectabilis some etc
crate palrectina prot ample, suprabasal
lf membrane crowded before the point of emergence of
the lateral 2's. 3's loosely and very percan.
To 4° not loosely articulated, 3's L to me etc.