X V11329 Quercus groenlandica Hew II (1871) p. 471, Pl. 45(4b) Although label claims this is illust spec it cannot be the one rep. on Pl 45(4b). If is an apical frag of a penn Crasp if no pire. 3°2. Spec ident in Pl 53 (s) as Corus first is not a Corus but an undk basal frag. If an apparently ctinotinous (pelin?) If pros belonging to Platanus or Homometidal. 3° sin obsolete. apical part of the specimen belongs to "Vit." cypanoides complex. X V11330 Quercus olafzeni Hew II (1871) p. 471, Pl. 46(2) Large Basal frag of a large, penn round, app. Crasp. If, with thin pire 3°2, l.o. sin. 4°2 can hardly be seen in a few area thus app sub orth. in their origins. No trace of a fimbrial sin exits other along margp but this may be due to lack of preservation. Marg with shallow gently rounded teeth, not as illust except bottom at 3 teeth. But not an orb. V 11344 Velumum whypperi Hew II (1871) p.464, Pl 46(1) Holotype spec. An ill If, no venate margin although most of this is wroded away and cut as shown in fig. Seco sel. str. lam# pros curving outward, level 2 po bearing outer branches to > 2's running to teeth (postably) shortly, 3° sin thick + oppostely pire. If not a Corpus Clorsts amen andqoe would be with to Vit- antiquum & Vit Cypanoides. ? Why not just Crylus. ?? Certainly not w/ V. cypanioides!