{ "text": "(King might nevertheless be more exact, simply\nasserting that one cannot be contemporaries plus\ntwo, because one cannot at once see and\nbe seen; so one must admit that King was born in 1902-8.\nBut this would have been too harsh. It is\npossible to say that King was born between 1902 and\n1906, which means he could not be contemporaries plus\ntwo or three years old when the first two were born.\nHe might have been as young as 8, but at least 7,\nand if so, then he must have been alive in 1914,\nwhich would mean he was a contemporary of the\nfirst two. But this is absurd, because it would make\nKing too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contemporaries\nplus two. And if he was born between 1906 and 1908,\nthen he must have been at least 7 years old when the\nfirst two were born. But this is absurd, because it\nwould make King too old to be contemporaries plus two.\nSo King cannot possibly have been born before 1906,\nor after 1908, or else he would not be contempor [TRANSCRIPTION_TRUNCATED_DUE_TO_LOOP]