General Motors Wager O. et al. and on page 8, line 9, "the general purpose of the act is to provide a means by which the Secretary may issue rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this chapter." T. R. C. Co., Inc. In the case of T. R. C. Co., Inc., it was held that the court had no jurisdiction over the matter because the contract in question was not within the scope of the act. The court further held that the act did not apply to contracts which were entered into before the passage of the act. It was also held that the act did not apply to contracts which were entered into after the passage of the act but before the effective date of the act. 891, 8 p. M. There is a grave probability that this case has been decided incorrectly and should be reversed on appeal. The decision in this case was based on the assumption that the contract in question was not within the scope of the act. It is submitted that this assumption is incorrect and that the contract in question was within the scope of the act. 891, 9 p. M. It is held that the court has no jurisdiction over the case. The decision in this case was based on the assumption that the contract in question was not within the scope of the act. It is submitted that this assumption is incorrect and that the contract in question was within the scope of the act. There is a grave probability that this case has been decided incorrectly and should be reversed on appeal. The decision in this case was based on the assumption that the contract in question was not within the scope of the act. It is submitted that this assumption is incorrect and that the contract in question was within the scope of the act.