Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
Marshall, 1938
23.
Otus flammeolus
Whitakers, contin.,August 6
for 15 min. in usual fashion.(Alternating
singl- successions of single hoots with
successions of same preceded by triple note.)
Moved twice - ended up in high yellow pine
where remained concealed and in upper pt. tree.
During course of its calling, another male was
heard several hundred yd. S and once a sharp
whine was heard high in nearby pine which I
took to be the call of the female.This whine
was the usual 3[illegible] steps higher in pitch than the
male call, was longer, and ininflected downward.
None of the owls were seen. At least, however,
they are still callinfg, although not as much
as earlier in season.
Why is this group of owls calling, where-
as those at the NW corner of the property are
altogether silent? Which group is representim
of the entire population? They should now be
observed in all the terr. in order to get an
average estimate of theis seasonal phase of thei
behavior.
August 8
No Otus called up in terr. at NW corner
at dusk.
August 9
Dusk - at NW corner Whitakers. Couldn't
call up Otus,.However, did hear Strix calling
several hundred yd. to S* , probably within
its terr. on the S side Eshom Cr. I gave imita-
tions of Strix for quite a while and soon a
slight moan was heard from a yellow pine close
at hand.Was high ?(3[illegible] steps above normal pitch
for male call) , very slight in intensity,and
had double inflection : Up, then down again.
Was of longer duration than usual stacatt?@
call of male. Was obviously an alarm note
because if was given only imidiately after one
of my Strix hoots, and was invariably uttered
sooner or later after each hoot. Given only
singley, not in regular intervals, . Also could
be the usual call of female. Only collection