[illegible] [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] (T) = ? or [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] (g) = 1 + ?? [illegible] (g) = -(??, ??+h?) sign(3x-?) [illegible] (h=??+iV) 1 - ? [illegible] T = ... h=?? iV a way of [illegible] in they way. when used with a ??, it was 5 - the 2 below. no? I missed the first line because: were ?? on revlsv 2 9 is ] + ? in [illegible] [illegible] and ?? [illegible] [illegible] (9+) make it real, like T above. and the ??+?T a way found - third kind - that? ?? iV a way on +15) the 0 can with 2x (??, ?A) +?? (??, ??M) 1 - ??T