Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
christian
1959
Journal
thoughts
2/11
26 Nov. Mother Lode trip
I am perplexed as to how to handle the vegetational
situation. The two best approaches seem to me to
be: (1) plan the current vegetational distribution
and composition, and determine the ancient
human factors which have happened in the
various areas. This is the inductive method. For
example: this area was cut for pine, burnt
twice in ten years and protected for 25, followed
by clearing & now cattle raising is the prime
land use - an grass land. This example tells
us that irrespective of natural ecologic factors
the area was pine forest originally then due to
lumbering & recurrent fire events thru brush
succession which under fire protection
became very dense. Clearing enabled grasses
(annuals) to grow. From forest to grassland.
Thus: contemporary veg. & human land use
back into time.
The second approach would be to describe the
vegetation as as early a time possible thru
historical records. These primary sources will
tell a story: vegetation and land use.
The latter particularly lend more perspective
to the above approach. The "contact-time"
vegetation is not the "original" vegetation
but it is a starting point.
The mere point of view is theoretical.
No ecologists were present at the year before
the first white man wrote out a description
of the countryside. Who was there - dubious.
What were the human ecologic factors.
And what was going on.