Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
This specimen - C.G.S. 16332, may
indeed be a Pontefixites. But
obviously, if there are such things
as immature sceptites, they
would easily fit in loose definition
of this genus.
12. Some European references of note
Lopuski, C. 1911 (JAD says this much overlooked)
Contributions à l'étude de la faune
crétacée du plateeu de Lublini:
Compte Rendue des séances de l'z7
Soc. Scientifique de Varsovie (Warsaw)
IV (has sceptites) p. 104-140
and V (no sceptus this part) p. 182 etc
Mikhailov, N.P. 1951; Upper Cret.
immowrites of Europ. pt. USSR and their signif.
for the zonel stratig.
No. 129, Geol. Ser. No. 50, 1951
Trans. Inst. Geol. Sci, Acad. Sci. USSR
(JAD says this best and newest
7.