Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
{
"text": "October 29, 1933\n\nShould a p[illegible]d? Stopped But didn't get to eat.\n4:30-5:00 AM - quondam. Just getting by.\n\nHe may just not have acted for (liquidation) down\nHe always produced the Gummy gum. On\nHe has been caught with a [illegible] in his hand.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm going to do some more work on it.\n\nIn a nameless and anonymous way I noticed\nIf Wilson, I noted 5-6. For [illegible] & be\nFor [illegible] studios, there appears to be\nTo guard our [illegible] with a [illegible]\n(To guard it) (to guard it) [illegible] with a [illegible]\n\n[illegible] and [illegible] - one hour\nWith [illegible] & be\n\nIt was very good. We did not want to do anything.\n\nOctober 28, 1933\n\n[illegible]\n\nThis too also had to be explained because we have\nNot got that good labour force. We did not want\nIt was a very good idea. The head of the department\nI'm
[TRANSCRIPTION_TRUNCATED_DUE_TO_LOOP]