pairs on the 2 species similar. A.C. not try to compare as A.b. v. two rounded at base as C.l. never quite is. Fruit very difas known before. But style & stigma helps to distinguish when in fl. In A.b. stigma is a def disk larger than style in C.C. " " " no broader than style. As the fr develops In C.b. style is thick, stubby v somewhat constricted at base (ie rather barrel shaped) In C.c. style is conical? In A.C. the unopened bud at tip of inf are dark (in C.b. atleast not as noticeably so. In A.C. petals seem (now to dry to measure) more widened at tip and less insensibly narrowed to insertion in C.b. but not (SUK) "of crenata v margin- ate". In A.C.- the basal nectary is flatter v more distinctly a nectary than in A.b.- and st. often curving at base before becoming erect (perhaps because of position at side? of rocks etc) 5-9-34 Globularia vulgaris l. Cote III 168, BM 264. SUK I 626 (varp. Wellcommi?) FL. Plana and B. Basal lob all (Cote) sometimes emarginate or scarcely 3-toothed. St. to 14 cm long with 8-12 small low tips apex. Head about 13 mm diam. Calyx tube 1/2 mm, teeth 2mm. The 3 large lobes of corolla are 3mm more and about 1/4-1/3 mm wide. The 2 smaller lobes are fuliform 1/2-2mm long. 5-4-34 Celtis australis l. Cote III 250, BM 283, SUK I 201 FL. Cult. Hotel Victoria [6-5-34 Add to fs. Ident for here Schusterkeib.