The latine uplift may not have been caused by the Cumanachia, and Cutaeum seas. In the paper before the U.S. P.S. In this event Latinia was a peninsula to the west of which lay at any landing in a cul de sac to the N.E., while to the east lay the [illegible] peninsula with entanglement. How does this affect the distribution of Congria deposits? The geologist due appear inclined to think Lannica was all gone in Cumanachia time other than the part of Latinia. Therefore the Cumanachia is a Gulf invasion followed by those of Cutaeums and Congria times. Why is the Cumanachian or colcaerum to the west? Shreepoor is on the latine uplift; it lies in the La. and Tucas line south of Arkansas line. The latine arch trend I. N. across Louisiana about like this Latinia -> [drawing of map] For detail see Bull 4, 1905, Pl. 37 of La. Survey. Also see Hill, U.S. G.S. Ann. Rep. 1899. Also