Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
August 19. Harkers Bay. North shore continued
Dunbar's section and my on page 162 did not finish the section
on the north shore for want of time. Today I saw here in addition to
what is described there atms 120 feet of then bedded and laminated
muddy li. They are irregularly bedded and in places distinctly buffy.
There are also many zones of flat pettite interst, Engd. All together in
the section one sees a little of a white heavy bedded quartzite.
He did not go farther east as the craft seemed to expose no more rock.
It is less than a half mile to the south of East River.
To the above 120 feet must be added at least 214 feet of strata
and 290 on page 174. (This means for the north shore 624 feet of argillaceous)
described by Dunbar on pages 161-162. I mean this is not the true thickness,
men, it is all that is in plain sight and was measured. Whatever
the thickness all must be added to the strata of the south shore which
is at least 313 feet and may be nearer 400 feet. The latter figure added
to that seen along the north shore would give a thickness of at least
734 feet. Further all the strata seen up the river is at least 100 feet
of sandstone but this might as much 200 feet, 60 feet of marl and 50
feet of dark sandy li. These at least 160 feet of strata seem to differ
from those of both the north and south shores. Therefore we seem to have
at least 884 feet of Lower Cambrian strata. See below.
The Cambrian seen of Toronto river are the lowest, those of the south
shore next, while those of the north shore are the youngest.
On the 20th of August I concluded to take only of the Cambrian the
290 feet mentioned above. This leaves the seen L.C. thickness 944 feet.
Another calculation makes it from 903-1065 mft adding the 63 feet of East River.