"de agree into the schools are only on the living side (general) who may be called "luddites" and those on the "doleful" side usually "agri flattons" which he thinks belong to the latter school and thereby does not know his own forms. Dezatti's philosophy is all rot and he charges that in "this world" we cannot know the times & descent. It left he puts no value in Dezatti's own philosophy. Ami he thinks very little of and says as at variance with are the men of the party. He does not care to give his opinion regarding any of the contemporary did get the facts as he selects them are all in favor of Amij. For instance he says that Flitch he worked for 20 years in Nova Scotia and has paid his attention to fruits. Certain a horseman for any such girlgirl. Then Dr Lawson on "The Times" of certain parts calls cutar by Dermia (which Huston ad David White said perhaps say are Calomining. Further he places great value on the determination of the latter and yet he will go into the Amij's as to the age of the beds, because he is no paleo botanist. Under such critical stages Ami is left alone to put the palaeo tigraphed stratigraphy without the support