Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
1979 Walter D. Koenig
Melanerpes formicivorus
Gazebo
(19 July) response to a Barn Owl in the area. After some fuss one
of them did roost in the nest hole while the other flew
down by me toward the former roost area.
20 July
500. The ambush went successfully, netting me the unbanded
♂, as I expected. (The ambush was done at the nest hole).
He was banded and bled, and is now ♂516.
Ron watched here later on and cleared up the mystery of
the 3rd bird: he's another unbanded ♂! This will
clearly call for some reorganizing in this group. Plus it
means that there is work yet to be done here!
24 July
Having found a hole in a tree down the road slightly from the nest
tree where birds were roosting, I ambushed this morning. I'd seen
2 birds go in but when the time came I ended up with 3-
the ♂ I caught on 20 July plus 2 (count them: 1,2) unbanded
♂. Both these birds were adults, I think. Both were also bled
and banded as ♂517 and ♂518.
This new plethora of unbanded ♂ calls into question what in
fact has gone on here since I first caught the birds late last
winter. The 2 major options are ① the unbanded ♂ remaining from
my ambushes persists, is one of the 3 ♂ I've just banded, and at
some point probably prior to the nest was joined by 2 new, unbanded
♂; ② ♂480 and the unbanded ♂ from last winter disappeared and
were replaced, again prior to the breeding season, by a set of 3 new
♂. My preference here is for the latter scenario; of course, with
no way to prove things one way or the other I will ostensibly follow
the more conservative (but less likely) route ① in my banding records.
Though no decent observations of the ♂ had been made