Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Smithsonian Institution Archives.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
R.S.Brown
1968
Fairy Tern
McKean Island
20 Oct. Worked at Fairy Tern nests on
the high SW walls and the entire
large central complex of walls. Data
as follows:
Egg
SDY
MDY
LFY
Imm.
Total
20 Oct.
HSW Walls
2
2
-
4
20 Oct.
CC
17
2
2
26
24 Oct.
NW Circular Wall
5
1
2
8
TOTAL
24
6
4
2
38
20 Oct.
All eggs were measured as follows:
38.2 x 29.6
38.2 x 29.4
38.7 x 30.7
38.8 x 31.2
38.9 x 30.9
39.0 x 30.0
39.2 x 30.2
39.5 x 30.3
39.5 x 31.6
39.6 x 29.9
40.1 x 29.9
40.9 x 31.1
41.0 x 30.3
41.0 x 31.4
41.5 x 30.4
42.1 x 31.2
42.1 x 32.2
43.8 x 33.2
44.0 x 39.7
Total 19
Stage of Incubation
Fr.
VSC 1.
VSC 2.
SE
MI
Yolken
20 Oct.
4
1
1
4
5
4
Total
5
1
1
5
6
4
Total 19
Egg measurements, 24 Oct
40.0 x 31.0
39.9 x 31.1
38.2 x 29.2
40.1 x 33.4
40.6 x 31.3
R.S.Brown
1968
Fairy Tern
McKean Island
20 Oct. Measurements of the culmen from
appared skin (free of down or feathers) to
tip of upper mandible were taken on
all chicks. The individuals were first
visually placed in an age class and
then measured.
SDY
MDY
LFY
Imm.
20.5 mm.
23.0 mm.
25.2 mm.
27.5 mm.
14.0 mm.
24.1 mm.
26.1 mm.
26.3 mm.
24.1 mm.
24.3 mm.
25.4 mm.
24.8 mm.
24.2 mm.
Hence by visual placement, there
is some overlap between individuals
in the middle down young and large
feathered young classes, and very
close measurements in the large
feathered young and immature groups.
A larger sample could no doubt
join a better series in which to
calculate lower and upper limits to the
various age classes. However, individual
variation will probably make this
criteria invalid; hence I can see no
reason for maintaining some age-class
method which utilizes measurements,
but it will allow a field worker to
utilize the same visual methods we
use in that one unfamiliar with
aging this species can check himself
with some concrete measurements.
All young were banded 7/12-57244-55.
One egg was known to be laid on 18 Oct,
High SW walls.