Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Smithsonian Institution Archives.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
R.S. Brown
1768
Audubon's Shearwater
Mexican Island
24 Oct.
One adult bird bailed up a gullty
3 or 3" Scoterides.
An adult & or fr. egg was atts'ts
Last tonight. Bird was pure melanis-
lic - had a few flecks of small
white feathers around the head
region, otherwise was all black.
The mate was normal colored. Nest
was under a pile of Porcelania
weeds (dead) just west of the main
wall complx on W. side. This is
the first I have ever seen personally
on this island.
This species is spreading
numerous in practically all sections
of the island at night. During the
They they are rarely in evidence, but
before coming in from the ocean at
near dusk. Apparently the Audubon
population is flight oriented & not
and I would imagine the vast bulk
of the resident population sleeps each
night on the island - shelters or at
the member, as feeding.
I inadvertently stumbled several
hundred of this species during the stay,
but never got a single band return.
I believe the bulk of the bands have
been worn off. They are fierce
little diggers. Since I had 410
moved #3 bands, I decided not
To waste time putting more aluminum
bands on.
Thus in effect I did little at
all with this species. To the best of
my recollection, I saw throughout
the stay about as many young young
of various sizes as I saw eggs.
The total & each, I would imagine
R.S. Brown
1768
Audubon's Shearwater
Archean Island
Oct
about 10 # each. Where I mainly
found while sleeping for WTS or
Salvador's Petrels. From fairly good
precollection, however, for every egg
or chick noted, about 10 nest cavities
were found empty with birds in-
them. There is certainly for first
nesting in mid July. I would
imagine that a loss or kill in
the nesting is occurring at this
time.
Birds however as everywhere.
In all types of cover and over the
whole island except washed layers-
I had neither the opportunity nor the
device to meet with any female, Friday
Testing with this species without
very fouls and so made no
actual density counts. I believe
the July figures were considerably
high (2-500) and think that
there can be no less than 8000
of this species present, probably consid-
ertably more. Taking into consider-
atting the number of fledglings present
on both living quays should - although there,
the failed females in our series, I
ollback
Do not believe they can be any
less than 500 Audubon's considering
their widespread presence in all types
of habitat.