California Condor Eben McMillan / June 1964 With Mrs. Gladys McMillan accompanying me, I left for Bakersfield, Cal., at 8:15 A.M. where I was supposed to meet with representatives of the District Attorney's Office in regards to the handling of the Condor shooting case. I was in the D.A.'s office waiting room at 9:55 A.M. After a twenty-five minute wait I was met and led to his office, by Mr. Tony Klein. Mr. Klein is an assistant District Attorney. The first information he wanted was a general description of the Condor and its habits. He said he knew nothing of Condor and wanted enough information whereby his knowledge of the subject we were about to discuss would be such that he would understand the problem more fully. I gave Mr. Klein a brief summary of Condor whereabouts and their present dilemma. He then asked for a general resume of conditions and activities that led up to the incident where the Condor was wounded. This I did. Following this meeting with Mr. Klein, whereby we went over all facets relative to the Condor incident, Mr. Klein gave me his thinking as to what could assume might develop in regard to setting a conviction. First he stated that without a corpus delicti, or body of the crime, such as the carcass of the bird, or other pertinent evidence, it would be quite difficult to prosecute the case. Without the body of the bird there would have to be a confession from Bernice Harris that he saw Howard Binkley shoot at the bird. This would be ample proof that Binkley,