Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
Unprecedent-
successive utterances of the same phrase, through three, four, five
and "five and a half"; the latter being when he finished the succession
of 5 and began the next phrase by using the first part, only,
of the one just five times repeated.
A new phrase
easily recognized again when heard in the future. The other bird
now joined BW in the ironwood and the character of both songs im-
mediately changed, being more conversational and of about the vol-
olume of quarter song. BW's new phrase could still be heard occasion-
ally, but softly. They sat about 4 feet apart. Song ceased and BW
began to peck at the leaves near him. They remained in the tree
for about 10 minutes longer, then Bw led the way to the suet feeding
stations. It could now be seen that the other bird was Longbill.
BW had called her from a distance. They are evidently a pair.
They finally drifted off toward the west, from which direction song
could be hear occasionally up to 2 P.M. About noon I went down
there and again identified both birds.
Pheasant fright-
While I was watching them at the oval lawn the pheasant and want-
ed food, taking worms from hand with little hesitation. When I
went to the west fence to look up Rhody about 1:30 P.M. (I had given
him worms there earlier in the day) the pheasant followed.
Rhody was shy of him, but came to the top of the fence, and at
last flew down. This scared the pheasant, who immediately bolted
out of sight! Rhody would only follow as far as the side gate, and
there he dashed out to the street, apparently afraid of the invisible
pheasant. I went and got him a mouse and he came back at once for
it, but would not come up into the garden.
At 2:20 I found him sitting in the lot next to the Scamells' and
gave him another mouse to test the theory that, as this would prob-
ably satisfy his food requirements for the day, he would go to roost
early. He went to his favorite post on the west lot, bush C (See
map). I got my car and parked 25 feet from him to watch in comfort
when it appeared that he was going to stick indefinitely--and he
did stick! I dozed in the car, but each time I awakened it was seen
that he had not shifted an inch. He appeared to watch me most of
the time. At last it occurred to me that perhaps he wanted another
mouse and would not go to roost until he got it; so I surrendered
meekly about 4 P.M., got him a mouse, and he was not interested in
the slightest. He turned his back on me and looked off far to the
south.
About 4:10 he directed his attention to the east and gazed inten-
ly toward the "Clearing" as if he had seen the pheasant there, or
had just remembered that he might be there. He now began a cautious
stalkin that direction looking and listening carefully. Finally
about 4:20 he reached the fence and came down to the street; then
crossed to the Scamells', ignoring me. This was all wrong! I join-
ed him and, at 4:30, he went up into the Scamell oak: his first known
roosting place. He did not relax, but stood on a limb, tail unsup-
ported and gazed off to the west. About 10 minutes later he shift-
ed a foot or so to the exact spot which he had used as a couch so long.
I supposed he was settled for the night, but after chatting a
few minutes with Dr. Scamell, had another look to verify his pres-
ence only to find that he had disappeared silently. After looking
in the Canary pine and other trees at the Scamells' I went to his
regular roost tree on the west lot and found him installed in his
house after all, about 5 P.M. Now I wonder what all this means.
October 30th.
R in his house
at noon. Rain during the night (?) and in the forenoon. At noon I look-
ed up Rhody, finding him still ( or again) in his house in the roost-