Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by American Museum of Natural History.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
I quickly got in touch with natives who admitted its existance
in certain areas, but all said it was extremely rare and doubted
I could get one, and certainly not a series. On my first real
day's shooting I saw one and actually because of close range
used a 32 caliber cartridge on it, but failed to kill the bird.
It was certainly a good augury for the status of the species and
later investigations bore it out fully. Unfortunately my work
on the island has reawakened the natives to its increasing
numbers and it may suffer some persecution from now on. A
factor in its favour is that it is not easily collected and,
numbers being not as plentiful as before the cyclone, natives
may get discouraged after 1 or 2 attempts proving fruitless. Also
a further factor in its favour is that in the area where it is
most plentiful the natives have now more money than heretofore,
as further areas of coconuts have come into bearing, and their
money needs are better supplied. In the northern area there is
still considerable poverty, amongst the catholic natives princi-
pally, because of lack of coconuts and other causes and doubtless
these natives will persecute the species somewhat in their own
area. Actually the five specimens sent off Uvea during my stay
there all came from that district. Fortunately I was able to
get an oar in in both cases of birds (young birds) for sale (3
in one case and 2 in another) and persuade local whites to pay
no more than 10 francs (40 cents American) for them. This
naturally suited whites as profits were larger for them and both
missed seeing my object which was to discourage native catchers
by the low figure and as both were native lads of 14 years or so
of age neither voiced any protest but doubtless on returning home
would air disappointed feelings in their villages sufficient to