Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Ernst Mayr Library.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
Empidonax Traillii alnorum -
Notes on Certain Flycatchers of the Genus Empidonax.
by Wm B Brewster.
Empidonax traillii alnorum, new subspecies. ALDER FLY-
CATCHER.
Auk, XII, Apr., 1895, pp. 161-3.
Subspec. char.—Differing from E. traillii (i. e., E. “pusillus” of Baird
and subsequent authors) in having the coloring of the upper parts richer
and more olivaceous, the wing bands yellower and hence more conspicu-
ous, the bill decidedly smaller and the legs rather shorter. Type No. 1367,
collection W. B. & ad., Upton, Maine, June 3, 1872.
There is of course nothing new about this separation or the
characters on which it is based. Indeed, all of the latter — as
21
Baird apparently did not have the Audubonian specimens before
him when he made the comparison of traillii and pusillus above
referred to. At least he does not allude to them in the text nor
are they included in his tabular lists. The series of what he con-
sidered to be true traillii comprised nine examples, of which one
came from New Hampshire, seven from Carlisle, Pennsylvania,
and one from Mexico. The Carlisle birds were all taken in May
and were unquestionably migrants on their way to northern New
England or New York. Hence it is evident that his impressions
of traillii were based on material which did not really represent
that bird.
I must confess to a certain sense of relief that, as has been
just shown, the responsibility for the above separation rests
mainly on shoulders other and broader than mine; for while I
honestly believe it to be based on intrinsically sound characters,
the differences between the two birds in question are, after all,
so slight and so difficult of verification without the aid of large
series of specimens for comparison that the identification of
individual specimens by descriptions alone is an almost hopeless
task. This, however, is by no means a novel condition among
Empidonaces, for this puzzling group includes several forms which
are positively known to be distinct species, but which in the
dried skins cannot always be distinguished with either ease or
certainty.
The respective breeding ranges of E. traillii and E. t. alnorum
cannot be mapped at present with entire precision, but I have had
no hesitation in referring to the former all the breeding specimens
that I have examined from the Mississippi Valley south of the
42nd parallel of latitude, and from North America at large west
of the Plains, including skins from Fort Resolution on Great Slave