Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
JESimpson,
1938.
68.
270ft., Rancho de Costa Rica, Rio Sonora, Sonora.
May 3, 1938, continued.
and 3 ♀♂; not saved), and a juvenile Peromyscus eremicus
→ Perognathus penicillatus (dead in trap),
(not saved); in live traps: 7 Reithrodontomys sp. and
5 Perognathus flavus sonoricensis (topotypes). Put the
latter five: ♂291-294; ♀296; and the five pocket-mice
saved alive from yesterday: ♂286-87, ♀288-290; of
these ten: ♀288, 289, and 296 were molting.
Dr. Benson suspected the Reithrodontomys sp.
are an entirely new species; so we have taken good
series. Probably the 3 harvest mice(260-262)
I caught 11.3 miles
w. of Hermosillo are the same form.
Here at Costa Rica the live-traps have come into
their own — for the most harvest mice and pocket-
mice (P.f. sonoricensis) that were especially wanted were
taken in the tin-boxes and not in the mousetraps. So,
previously stated to the contrary, I must admit that
under particular circumstances the tin-boxes are
probably more effective in taking small mice than
the "museum special" mousetraps.
Dr. Benson in setting his mousetraps at
the edge of the field caught many Perognathus
penicillatus near the mesquite in sandy soil and many
P. baileyi near irrigation ditch at mesquite border in
harder ground while the traps out in the wheat-field and
cornfield caught few of those pocket-mice but many
P. flavus. Aside from pocket-mice, habitat restriction
was also seen in that few Peromyscus eremicus were