Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
John grid
08,30 08,31 08/9,1 nov,2
603 q ad. vog not ften Phyle osilos F1 E2 c3 B3
604 q " " " " " " F6 F4 F4
605 ?ad. Calomys duiclla c6 F7 c8
606 ? ad. Bolomys berlepschii B3 A3
9:30am
607 4 ad. vog ofen B. amoenus K1
608 8 ad " " I3 D5 J4
609 8 Calomys duiclla L3 L3
610 ?ad Ph, sublinis L7
same {611 q ad Bolomys amoenus J2 J2
traps }612 8" " " J2 J1
613 4 ad Ph. osilos F2 F3 E2
614 q " " "
10am D2
616 ?ad Bolomys amoenus G3
617 ? ad vog ofen " " I4,I6
- ?ad dead " " II t
618 4ad. vog.ofen " " F1 J1
620 0 Bolomys berlepschii B1
- 8ad Ph. osilos H1
- - Calomys duiclla H4
- q Ph. darwiniosilos E4
Total mice caught on area: 8 Bolomys amoenus, 6 Phyllosis osilos,
3 Calomys duiclla, 2 Bolomys berlepschii, 1 Aukacosmys sublinis x 1.47
Ranger and densitien: amoenus 41m. = 2.06/m ha; osilos 40m = 2.24/ha;
duiclla 29m = 1.75/ha; berlepschii asuming 1.73
10/30 10:30 small legard I8 0.81
45 0.440 30m = 0.76/ha; sublinis asuming 30m = 0.38/ha. Total mice =
0.297
7.19 per ha,