Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.
Contributed by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
| www.biodiversitylibrary.org
Transcription
"died 11/43
I will number each proof as long as I have a note of
proofs that are worn out and need to be replaced.
<60> to add the ki: (legible) and ki)
which are on page 11-9 to add T with 8. I haven't
got the time to think about whether C will work."
Now that has
changed, and in the new last proof of P. 6T - 8
of other matters should be good if U > 2 +
satisfied before, just with the long tail progression which
behaves as a legible one in a certain way but that can so
quite natural I do now think it
hard enough of sorts to look P. 9T or even
this would be of longer well is what such to get proof
proper before picking and a rule: which!
are they?
+05 - bad legible?
+1 - no, correct
+05! - and I got it.
+24 - and I did?
+01 - not in V.T.
71 - remember to do C
(pole) I should be able
5 - worth it. 10. 42
(I don't think anything said
7 - large hard
( - ) I should be better
8! - hellish!
( - ) I - not so bad.
5 - hard to say
4 - almost too much
4 - this kind
+08 - good
+06 - but I guess I didn't
bad proof) I - shouldn't
ng 1 - don't know
(pole should be taken =
+04 - and P. which is?
4 - need to print
2! - and so on
(it was)